Monday, October 26, 2015

Digrassi's His True Art of Defense - The Sword & Target Part 1



Foreword by Dwight

Learn to defend yourself against 16th century fencing a-holes! In this section, we move away from the small shield or buckler and move onto the shield known as the Target. The Target was a squarish shield generally made of iron or iron plated wood. It is funny that is was referred to as a target, which makes me wonder if that is where the modern definition of target, an object selected for the aim of an attack. I will present the section on the sword and target then give my brief musings on this section.

(Corresponding Podcast)

Of the Sword & Target, called the Square Target

It is most manifest, that the Target is the most ancient weapon, found out only for the use of warfare, and not for frays and peculiar quarrels between man and man. Albeit, since the finding thereof, there have been devised by the industry of man a thousand ways to serve them at their need: From whence it hath come to pass, (because it seemed convenient unto the professors of this Art) that this weapon was very commodious and profitable, as well for this fashion, as for that it is a mean or middle weapon, between the buckler and the round target. That they have framed a special kind of play there with, although it differeth from the other two weapons in no other thing then in the fashion. Therefore, diverse professors of this Art, being moved, some by reason of the from, some by the bigness, and some by the heaviness thereof, have accustomed to bare it after diverse ways, those who make most account of heaviness, would for some confederation, that the right and proper baring thereof was to hold it leaning on the thigh, not moving there hence, but being greatly constrained there unto.

Others, who esteemed the form and bigness thereof, because it seemed unto them that the Target without any other motion was most apt of it self to ward all that part of the body which is betwixt the neck and the thigh, bare it with their arm drawn back close to their breast. The which opinion, I mean not at this present to confute, for as much as by the shewing of mine own opinion, it shall appear how mightily they were deceived in the holding there of, from the true holding where of springeth all the profit which his form and bigness doth give it.

The manner how to hold the Square Target

Being desirous to bare great respect as well to all the qualities of this Target (which are, the form, the bigness and heaviness) as unto that where with it may either help or hurt, I say (if a man would that the form thereof do bring him profit without hurt) it is to be holden with the high point thereof upwards respecting the head: the part opposite, the low parts of the body: the right part thereof, the right side, and the left, the left side: from this manner of baring spring these advantages. First, a man may more easily see his enemy, and view what he doth by the point of the corner, which is on the one side, and that is by the high point by which, if would behold his enemy, from the head to the feet, it is requisite that he carry his target, to low, that he discover not too much of his body which is above it: to the warding whereof he cannot come again, but discommodiously, and in long time.

Besides, the said commodity of beholding the enemy, there is also another that is of warding: For the Target being born after this manner (framing a triangle) that sharp corner thereof respecteth the forehead, and the sides thereof so spread themselves, that through the least motion, any big man who so ever, may stand safe behind them. And if blows come at the head, be they thrusts or edgeblows, all of them light upon one of the said sides, behind which standeth the head safe without hindering of the eyesight. 

The other two sides of the target, right and left with very small motion, ward the right and left side of the body, in such sort, that a man may also draw back his arm: For the left side of the target wardeth the elbow, which it doth not do, when the high side thereof is carried equal. To conclude therefore, that in holding the Target, his bigness may the better ward, for the causes above said being superfluous to be repeated again, I counsel, it to be holden with the arm stretched forth from the body, no accompting the heavens to be hurtful, because a man contiunueth not long in so holding it: and fi the too long holding be painful, he may draw back his arm, and rest himself. The better to do this and to be able to see the enemy, i say he shall hold it, his arm stretched out, with the high point outwards, respecting the forehead.

Musings by Dwight

What I liked about this section was the shield was designed to help ward off attacks with a small efficient amount of motion, just as a thrust was designed to attack a target with the least amount of movement. You can apply the same principle to unarmed combat, using defensive movements in efficient manners, say like a parry.

So how do you defend against an evil fencing a-hole with a target? Shoot him in the foot of course!


References:
"Shields: History and Terminology." Shields: History and Terminology. Pitt Rivers Museum. Web. 18 Oct. 2015. http://www.prm.ox.ac.uk/Kent/shieweap/shgenex3.html

Digrassi, Giacomo. "His True Art of Defence." University of Massachusetts and Raymond J. Lord. Web. 18 Oct. 2015. http://www.umass.edu/renaissance/lord/pdfs/DiGrassi_1594.pdf

Friday, October 23, 2015

Quick Jab Report: UFC Fight Night Dublin Predictions


Fighting in Dublin

Double Down Paddy Daly

The Dark Pool stirring





Welcome Martial Arts Enthusiasts! This week in MMA, UFC Fight Night Dublin. Dublin means the Dark Pool, and only a few will emerge victorious from the Dark Pool this Saturday.  The main event featured Dustin Poirier whom was supposed to fight Joe Duffy, unfortunately Duffy concussed himself earlier this week and so that match is out the window. Very Very unfortunate, I was looking forward to that fight. Additionally, Conor McGregor was quick to be Duffy's replacement, obviously an offer in jest.

Now the main event features Paddy "The Hooligan" Holohan against Louis "Da Last Samurai" Smolka. Holohan has a record of 12 wins and 1 loss. Over last his three fights he had 2 wins and 1 loss. How did these play out you ask? In late 2014, he lost by decision to Chris Kelades. Then in 2015, "The Hooligan" defeated Shane Howell and Vaughan Lee by unanimous decision. Here is a sweet clip by the UFC on Paddy Holohan:




Holohan's opponent, Hailing from Hawaii, "Da Last Samurai" Smolka has a record of 9 wins and 1 loss.  In his last three fights he has a record of 2 wins and 1 loss. Here is the backstory. In May 2014, Smolka lost a split decision to Chris Carlaso. In late 2014, Smolka knocked out Richie Vaculik. Lastly in July of this year, "Da Lst Samurai" defeated Neil Seery by decision. 



The second match up I am interested in is Aisling "Ais the Bash" Daly versus Ericka Almeida. Hailing from Ireland, Daly has a record of 15 wins and 6 losses. In the last three fights she has a record of 2 wins and 1 loss. Here are the stories of the those fights. At CWFC 63 in 2013, she caught Karla Benitez in an arm bar submission. In 2014, at the UFC Ultimate Fighter she caught Alex Chambers in an arm bar submission. Lastly, earlier this year she lost a decision to Randa Marcos at UFC 186. What about her opponent?





Ericka Almeida, hails from Brazil with a record of 7 wins and 1 loss. Over the last three fights, she has a record of 2 wins and 1 loss. Let us recap. In 2014 at Jungle Fight 63, Almeida caught Maiara Amanajas with a rear naked choke. In April earlier this year, she performed a triangle choke on Jennifer Gonzales at Jungle Fight 67. Most recently Almeida lost a decision to Juliana de Lima Carneiro. So who will be victorious in Dublin?



In the fight between the Hooligan and the Samurai is really a toss up as I feel they are evenly matched. I think the result will be a decision win by Holohan, mostly for "Home Field Advantage". I really do believe that performing at home gives an advantage to the fighters. In the fight between Almeida and Daly, I believe Almeida will pull off a submission upset over Daly. The winners will reign over the Dark Pool.

Who do you think will win?

-Dwight




Reference:

"'See You at the Weigh Ins' – Conor McGregor Offers to Step in for Injured Joe Duffy - Independent.ie." Independent.ie. 22 Oct. 2015. Web. 22 Oct. 2015.  http://www.independent.ie/sport/mma/see-you-at-the-weigh-ins-conor-mcgregor-offers-to-step-in-for-injured-joe-duffy-34130850.html

"Sherdog.com: UFC, Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) News, Results, Fighting." Sherdog. Web. 23 Oct. 2015. http://www.sherdog.com

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Professor Mike Donovan's The Roosevelt That I Know - Part 1


Foreword by Dwight
Would you spar with the Governor? The President of the United States? Well that is exactly what Professor Mike Donovan did in the late 1800s. He wrote a book about his experience in 1909, titled "The Roosevelt That I know". Mike Donovan was considered one of the best practitioners of the sweet science at the time. Besides this point, the picture above of Donovan punching the "teddy" part of Roosevelt is very amusing. Part one describes his first encounter with Governor Roosevelt with some jarring consequences. Enjoy!

(Corresponding Podcast)

The Roosevelt That I Know
All the world knows Theodore Roosevelt, the statesman; the man who turned the light on the corporate highwaymen. He has made the "Big Stick" respected. But the "Big Stick" must be guided by law not so the fist; wherever you see a head hit it is the fighting rule; a word and a blow, but the blow first- the reverse of legal practice.

 In the following pages I propose to describe Theodore Roosevelt, the fighter, untrammeled by legal restriction; the lover of fistic encounter, as I know; the man of brawn and muscle, with a genuine fighting spirit and the courage of two ordinary men to sustain its promise. I intend further to describe his methods of attack and defense, and to note the analogy between the spirit he exhibits in boxing and that which has urged him on in those political encounters which have made him famous.

A succession of glove-fights with him, covering a period of more than ten years, in which we have met as man to man, where it was give and take, with no restrictions, gives me the right to speak authoritatively, and I wish to say here that, whether or not he was champion of his class in college, about which there has been some discussion in the press, it is admitted that he was an able fighting man then, ready to take his medicine and try again. I can say that he is the same man now- a man who asks no favors, cool in a fight, determined, aggressive, consumed with the purpose to overcome resistance, to win; a glutton for punishment, as the ring phrase goes. It is no exaggeration when I say that, in some mix-ups with him, I have been compelled to resort to all the arts and devices that have come to me from years of serious fighting, often to slug right and left to save myself.

I have noted his career in politics, seen him go for the mark there with the same pertinacity that he shows when boxing. Resistance, discomfiture, hard knocks in one domain as in the other server only to make him keener, to whet his appetite for the fray. Had he come to the prize-ring, instead of to the political arena, it is my conviction he would have been successful. The man is a born fighter; it's in his blood.

There are some who are easily diverted from their purpose, some who go impetuously forward with dash and spirit which will not be denied, but once the attack seems hopeless they hesitate and fly panic stricken in hopeless disorder. A few only remain; these, with conviction imbedded in their souls, cannot be stayed, even though they themselves would will it. They go tumultuously forward, even to the death.

Theodore Roosevelt is one of them. He reminds one of the biblical general who his men faint-hearted, wavering, at sight of the overpowering on-rush of Philistines, faced the tide undaunted, so firm was his purpose that he furiously laid about him till the last.

Even in death, the Bible tells us: "His sword clave to his hand" That is to say, the hilt of his sword was found to be imbedded in his palm, a sure indication that he never wavered from his purpose of attack. I have a vivid recollection of my first fistic encounter Theodore Roosevelt. The Governor left me in the old billiard room of the Executive Mansion at Albany, which he had fitted up as a gymnasium for his boys, in order that they might begin their physical education under his eye.

He then went downstairs to don his boxing clothes. In a few minutes he returned. It was the Governor of the State of New York who had left me. It was a fighting man who entered the room. He wore a sleeveless flannel shirt, his khaki rough rider uniform trousers and light canvas shoes without heels. First, I was struck by the expression of his eyes, which are large, light blue, placed well apart, aggressive, fearless, persistent. He is about 5 feet 8 inches in height, but his great breadth of shoulders and bulk of body make him seem shorter. His arms are short, but heavy and well-muscled. His head is that of the typical fighter. It is broad and symmetrical, poised on a powerful neck. A plumb line could be dropped from the back of his head to his waist. That formation shows not only the fighting spirit, but the physical vigor to sustain it. His short, thick body with its high, arched chest, is sturdily set on unusually strong, sinewy legs. I noticed he wore no belt, and told him he had better put one on.

He borrowed one from my brother Jerry. After pulling on his gloves he stepped forward on to the mat. Most men, on coming to box for the first time with a champion, present or retired, show some trepidation. There was none of that here. After we shook hands I studied him carefully. Then I led a left jab, following it up with a faint-hearted right that landed like a love-tap high up on his cheek. He dropped his hands and stopped. "Look here, Mike," he said indignantly; "that is not fair." I was afraid I had done something wrong. "What's the matter, Governor?" I asked. "You are not hitting me," he said, shaking his head. "I'd like you to hit out." "All right, Governor," I said, thinking to myself, this man has a pretty good opinion of himself. 

We started in again, and I sent in a hard right to the body as he rushed in, and then tried a swinging left for my jaw. He stepped inside and drove his right to my ear. It jarred me down to the heels. I realized at that moment that the Governor was no ordinary amateur. If I took chances with him I was endangering my reputation. From that day I have taken no chances with Theodore Roosevelt with the gloves. I've hit him many times as hard as ever I hit a fighter in the ring, without stopping him, and thousands know how hard I can hit. 

I want to say, now, that I never saw him wince or show even by an involuntary sign that he was discomfited in spirit, no matter how severe the bodily pain. On the contrary, it met with only that characteristic turning of the head a bit to the side, a grim smile and determined setting of the bulldog jaw, followed by another rush. Theodore Roosevelt is a strong, tough man; hard to hurt and harder to stop.

 
References:
Donovan, Michael Joseph. The Roosevelt That I Know; Ten Years of Boxing with the President--and Other Memories of Famous Fighting Men,. New York: B.W. Dodge, 1909. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=x7QaAAAAYAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA8&dq=boxing&ots=MYv8NVrKwf&sig=N21fmrbbSTU8P3S0scqcxphbg9M

"Quick Facts About and Almanac of Theodore Roosevelt." Quick Facts About and Almanac of Theodore Roosevelt. Web. 16 Oct. 2015. http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/trbioqf.html

"Teddy Roosevelt's Little-known Secret." Tribunedigital-chicagotribune. 7 Oct. 2002. Web. 16 Oct. 2015. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-10-07/features/0210070158_1_boxing-final-bout-theodore-roosevelt-association

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

Quick Jab Report: UFC 192 Results w/ Dwight's Sexy Scoring System

In Houston Texas
Cormier, Pena, Bader
Like Oil Splatters


Welcome Martial Arts Enthusiasts! This last weekend UFC 192 took place in Houston the largest city in Texas. Lets review the outcomes and put my scoring spin using my "Dwight's Sexy Scoring System". As I mentioned in a blog last month, scoring system in MMA sucks. So lets test a different system to give a more realistic score. 


 Daniel Cormier won a split decision against Alexander Gustaffson. 

The judges scored the fight as follows:

49-46 Cormier
48-47 Cormier
47-48 Gustaffson
  
 Here is how I scored the fight:





Cormier Gustafsson
Normal strikes ¼ pts 55 33
Significant Strikes 1/3 pts 47 40
Knock down 10 pts 0 10
take down 2 pts 2 2
Submission attempt 5 pts 0 0




Total
103 85

Cormier and Gustafsson put on a hell of show. Gustafsson had one good round of and knocked down Cormier, but could not finish him. Cormier was relentless the entire fight and just attacked, hit and punished Gustafsson.

In the next match, Bader versus Evans. The judges all scored the fight 30-27. This score doesn't instill the dominance Bader had over Evans. Here is how I scored the match.





Bader Evans
Normal strikes ¼ pts 14 7
Significant Strikes 1/3 pts 17 8
Knock down 10 pts 0 0
take down 2 pts 2 0
Submission attempt 5 pts 0 0




Total
33 15


Bring on the women's fights! Alright Julianna "The Venezuelan Vixen" Pena versus Jessica "Evil" Eye. All three judges scored the fight 29-27, which only tells us that Pena won each round.





Pena Eye
Normal strikes ¼ pts 25 19
Significant Strikes 1/3 pts 11 10
Knock down 10 pts 0 0
take down 2 pts 6 2
Submission attempt 5 pts 15 5




Total
42 31

Lastly, Rose Namajunas defeated Angela Hill in the first round by submission. Here is how I scored the fight up until the submission.






Rose Hill
Normal strikes ¼ pts 4 4
Significant Strikes 1/3 pts 4 4
Knock down 10 pts 0 0
take down 2 pts 2 0
Submission attempt 5 pts 5 0




Total
15 8


Fun night of fun fights in the Heart of Texas. How did you score the fights?

-Dwight


References:
http://m.ufc.com/event/UFC192

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Nitobe's Bushido Soul of Japan Veracity or Truthfulness



Foreword by Dwight

In the last section we discussed politeness and how a martial artist should carry themselves and have a certain presence "the economy of force". Next, Nitobe focuses on Veracity and Truthfulness. As I read through this section, my mind wandered to the differences between martial artists and martial fighters. My general feeling is that martial sport fighters really represent the opposite concept of veracity. Some are willing to be "untruthful" to win, this stems from all the steroid use. At the highest level of fighting some are looking for something a little bit extra to give them an advantage. And the advantage can particularly lead to a bigger paycheck. In this case, I feel that the sports side gives some a bit of a short sighted approach to martial arts. This isn't always the case but there have been quite a bit of drug instances in the last few years.

Where as Truthfulness, feels like very much apart of a traditional martial art like Karate or Tai Chi. Being Sincere is an invaluable and noble trait to learn, whether you are a young person learning to be a productive part of society, or if you are person in a leadership position. The importance of truthfulness and sincerity cannot be downplayed.


(Corresponding podcast)



 
Veracity or Truthfulness

To the question, "Which is the more important, to tell the truth or to be polite?" the Japanese are said to give an answer diametrically opposite to what the American will say, but I forbear any comment until I come to speak of veracity or truthfulness, without which Politeness is a farce and a show. "Propriety carried beyond right bounds," says MasamunĂ©, "becomes a lie." An ancient poet has outdone Polonius in the advice he gives: "To thyself be faithful: if in thy heart thou strayest not from truth, without prayer of thine the Gods will keep thee whole." The apotheosis of Sincerity to which Tsu-tsu gives expression in the Doctrine of the Mean, attributes to it transcendental powers, almost identifying them with the Divine. "Sincerity is the end and the beginning of all things; without Sincerity there would be nothing." He then dwells with eloquence on its far-reaching and long enduring nature, its power to produce changes without movement and by its mere presence to accomplish its purpose without effort. From the Chinese ideogram for Sincerity, which is a combination of "Word" and "Perfect," one is tempted to draw a parallel between it and the Neo-Platonic doctrine of Logos—to such height does the sage soar in his unwonted mystic flight.

Lying or equivocation were deemed equally cowardly. The bushi held that his high social position demanded a loftier standard of veracity than that of the tradesman and peasant. Bushi no ichi-gon—the word of a samurai or in exact German equivalent ein Ritterwort—was sufficient guaranty of the truthfulness of an assertion. His word carried such weight with it that promises were generally made and fulfilled without a written pledge, which would have been deemed quite beneath his dignity. Many thrilling anecdotes were told of those who atoned by death for ni-gon, a double tongue.

The regard for veracity was so high that, unlike the generality of Christians who persistently violate the plain commands of the Teacher not to swear, the best of samurai looked upon an oath as derogatory to their honor. I am well aware that they did swear by different deities or upon their swords; but never has swearing degenerated into wanton form and irreverent interjection. To emphasize our words a practice of literally sealing with blood was sometimes resorted to. For the explanation of such a practice, I need only refer my readers to Goethe's Faust.

A recent American writer is responsible for this statement, that if you ask an ordinary Japanese which is better, to tell a falsehood or be impolite, he will not hesitate to answer "to tell a falsehood!" Dr. Peery is partly right and partly wrong; right in that an ordinary Japanese, even a samurai, may answer in the way ascribed to him, but wrong in attributing too much weight to the term he translates "falsehood." This word (in Japanese uso) is employed to denote anything which is not a truth (makoto) or fact (honto). Lowell tells us that Wordsworth could not distinguish between truth and fact, and an ordinary Japanese is in this respect as good as Wordsworth. Ask a Japanese, or even an American of any refinement, to tell you whether he dislikes you or whether he is sick at his stomach, and he will not hesitate long to tell falsehoods and answer, "I like you much," or, "I am quite well, thank you." To sacrifice truth merely for the sake of politeness was regarded as an "empty form" (kyo-rei) and "deception by sweet words," and was never justified.

I own I am speaking now of the Bushido idea of veracity; but it may not be amiss to devote a few words to our commercial integrity, of which I have heard much complaint in foreign books and journals. A loose business morality has indeed been the worst blot on our national reputation; but before abusing it or hastily condemning the whole race for it, let us calmly study it and we shall be rewarded with consolation for the future.

Of all the great occupations of life, none was farther removed from the profession of arms than commerce. The merchant was placed lowest in the category of vocations,—the knight, the tiller of the soil, the mechanic, the merchant. The samurai derived his income from land and could even indulge, if he had a mind to, in amateur farming; but the counter and abacus were abhorred. We knew the wisdom of this social arrangement. Montesquieu has made it clear that the debarring of the nobility from mercantile pursuits was an admirable social policy, in that it prevented wealth from accumulating in the hands of the powerful. The separation of power and riches kept the distribution of the latter more nearly equable. Professor Dill, the author of "Roman Society in the Last Century of the Western Empire," has brought afresh to our mind that one cause of the decadence of the Roman Empire, was the permission given to the nobility to engage in trade, and the consequent monopoly of wealth and power by a minority of the senatorial families.

Commerce, therefore, in feudal Japan did not reach that degree of development which it would have attained under freer conditions. The obloquy attached to the calling naturally brought within its pale such as cared little for social repute. "Call one a thief and he will steal:" put a stigma on a calling and its followers adjust their morals to it, for it is natural that "the normal conscience," as Hugh Black says, "rises to the demands made on it, and easily falls to the limit of the standard expected from it." It is unnecessary to add that no business, commercial or otherwise, can be transacted without a code of morals. Our merchants of the feudal period had one among themselves, without which they could never have developed, as they did, such fundamental mercantile institutions as the guild, the bank, the bourse, insurance, checks, bills of exchange, etc.; but in their relations with people outside their vocation, the tradesmen lived too true to the reputation of their order.

This being the case, when the country was opened to foreign trade, only the most adventurous and unscrupulous rushed to the ports, while the respectable business houses declined for some time the repeated requests of the authorities to establish branch houses. Was Bushido powerless to stay the current of commercial dishonor? Let us see.

Those who are well acquainted with our history will remember that only a few years after our treaty ports were opened to foreign trade, feudalism was abolished, and when with it the samurai's fiefs were taken and bonds issued to them in compensation, they were given liberty to invest them in mercantile transactions. Now you may ask, "Why could they not bring their much boasted veracity into their new business relations and so reform the old abuses?" Those who had eyes to see could not weep enough, those who had hearts to feel could not sympathize enough, with the fate of many a noble and honest samurai who signally and irrevocably failed in his new and unfamiliar field of trade and industry, through sheer lack of shrewdness in coping with his artful plebeian rival. When we know that eighty percent of the business houses fail in so industrial a country as America, is it any wonder that scarcely one among a hundred samurai who went into trade could succeed in his new vocation? It will be long before it will be recognized how many fortunes were wrecked in the attempt to apply Bushido ethics to business methods; but it was soon patent to every observing mind that the ways of wealth were not the ways of honor. In what respects, then, were they different?

Of the three incentives to Veracity that Lecky enumerates, viz: the industrial, the political, and the philosophical, the first was altogether lacking in Bushido. As to the second, it could develop little in a political community under a feudal system. It is in its philosophical, and as Lecky says, in its highest aspect, that Honesty attained elevated rank in our catalogue of virtues. With all my sincere regard for the high commercial integrity of the Anglo-Saxon race, when I ask for the ultimate ground, I am told that "Honesty is the best policy," that it pays to be honest. Is not this virtue, then, its own reward? If it is followed because it brings in more cash than falsehood, I am afraid Bushido would rather indulge in lies!
If Bushido rejects a doctrine of quid pro quo rewards, the shrewder tradesman will readily accept it. Lecky has very truly remarked that Veracity owes its growth largely to commerce and manufacture; as Nietzsche puts it, "Honesty is the youngest of virtues"—in other words, it is the foster-child of industry, of modern industry. Without this mother, Veracity was like a blue-blood orphan whom only the most cultivated mind could adopt and nourish. Such minds were general among the samurai, but, for want of a more democratic and utilitarian foster-mother, the tender child failed to thrive. Industries advancing, Veracity will prove an easy, nay, a profitable, virtue to practice. 

Just think, as late as November 1880, Bismarck sent a circular to the professional consuls of the German Empire, warning them of "a lamentable lack of reliability with regard to German shipments inter alia, apparent both as to quality and quantity;" now-a-days we hear comparatively little of German carelessness and dishonesty in trade. In twenty years her merchants learned that in the end honesty pays. Already our merchants are finding that out. For the rest I recommend the reader to two recent writers for well-weighed judgment on this point. It is interesting to remark in this connection that integrity and honor were the surest guaranties which even a merchant debtor could present in the form of promissory notes. It was quite a usual thing to insert such clauses as these: "In default of the repayment of the sum lent to me, I shall say nothing against being ridiculed in public;" or, "In case I fail to pay you back, you may call me a fool," and the like.

Often have I wondered whether the Veracity of Bushido had any motive higher than courage. In the absence of any positive commandment against bearing false witness, lying was not condemned as sin, but simply denounced as weakness, and, as such, highly dishonorable.


References:
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/12096/12096-h/12096-h.htm